Oil and Gas lease bonus payments can be structured for tax savings

In this weeks edition of Speaking of Settlements we look at one of the more innovative programs in the non-qualified market and that is the structuring of oil and gas lease bonus payments through the use of a structured settlement annuity device.

As many people in the structured settlement profession know, Allstate Financial has been a consistent innovator in the area of structured taxable damage awards, as well as structuring the sales of appreciated real estate through their structured sales program. They continue their progressive ways with the announced ability to now structure oil and gas lease bonus payments, allowing people who are leasing their land for oil and gas drilling to defer bonus payments into future years tax returns.

Oil and Gas lease bonus payments, how to structure them for tax savings

The reason this is so important and valuable is that the bonus payment is on top of the annual or quarterly lease payments and is typically a one time bonus up front. By being able to move those dollars into future years, you are able to spread the tax hit over time, earn interest on the funds while deferring, guarantee payments on a fixed schedule and ideally receive them when you are in a lower tax bracket or have other off setting deductions. Of course, on top of the tax benefits, many people just find the idea of being able to secure future payments with the bonus funds to simply be prudent financial planning and want to take advantage of that option now.

To learn more about the Allstate Financial Oil and Gas leasing bonus program, you can go to my firms website at www.wahlstromandassociates.com.

The impact of the S&P down grades on five major life insurance companies

In what we can assume will be the first of several down grades for major life insurance companies in the structured settlement markets, S&P quickly down graded five premier life insurance companies yesterday from AAA to AA+.  The companies who were impacted by this are:

New York Life was dropped to a AA+

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance was dropped to a AA+

USAA was dropped to a AA+.

Knights of Columbus was dropped to a AA+.

Teachers Insurance and Annuity. TIAA, was dropped to a AA+.

So what exactly does this mean and what are the implications for the life insurance industry and structured settlements in general? I address some of the concerns in this weeks video broadcast of Speaking of Settlements but in short the impact should be minimal other than to the pride of the companies listed above.

It is a sickening process in that each of those five firms went to great lengths over the last three years to do the things needed to retain a coveted AAA rating and in some cases make it a key element of their marketing campaigns, only to suffer this immediate down grade as a result of the fact that they hold a large portion of US government obligations precisely because they are so conservative and careful.

As I have been saying for years, our industry uses these ratings at our peril as the rating firms really could care less about the impact of their down grades on companies marketing and reputations and the idea of using S&P as a rating agency for life markets has been a bad idea for decades. I have always preferred AM Best as the best source of information on insurance company standards and solvency and they are not as reactive as the other firms.

Enjoy today’s video on the S&P down grade and it’s impact on the insurance and structured settlement profession, but it would be wise to stop using rating agency rankings as some sort of validation of safety and instead do your own research on markets and firm to match the right company to the right risk.

Allstate rolls out their structured sales product for oil & Gas Lease bonus payments

In yet another innovative move by Allstate Financial and their structured settlement division, it was announced this week that Allstate would be rolling out yet another “non-qualified” annuity funding vehicle that would allow for the structuring of oil and gas lease bonus payments.

While seemingly obscure to those who do not have land upon which they lease oil or gas rights to drilling or production companies, this market has substantial potential given the wide number of privately held or closely held businesses, as well as individuals, who might be interested in spreading the bonus payments they get in some years over a several year period. The fact is in an era of rising oil and gas prices, these lease bonus payments can be substantial and many owners of the leases would prefer to spread those big bonus years where oil and gas prices spike, over several years if possible, or even defer it far into the future when the oil or gas lease might be played out or sold. This is going to be a really solid planning tool in this niche market.

This particular product has one key feature in that there is a revenue ruling, RR 68-606, which specifically addresses the tax treatment of this technique, something that has inhibited the use of structured sales and income deferral strategies in the areas such as celebrity endorsements and divorce settlements.

Learn more about this announcement by viewing this weeks edition of Speaking of Settlements, where Mark Wahlstrom discusses some of the basic issues and for whom this product or strategy might be suitable. 

Mark Wahlstrom on Allstate Oil and Gas lease Bonus, structured settlement program

You can learn more about how the new Allstate Structured Settlement product for Oil and Gas Lease Bonus payments works by contacting Arizona based structured settlement expert and broker, Mark Wahlstrom at Wahlstrom & Associates in Scottsdale, AZ

The rat in the settlement industry, someone is selling names to factoring companies and it’s about to get messy

Sure it’s a long title, but how else do you get the attention and focus of people in the structured settlement profession that there is growing evidence of a rat in our profession, and possibly more than one. As Jack Nickelson says in “The Departed”” I hate a rat “and I think in this case most of the responsible brokers in our profession are in full  agreement with that sentiment.

As this video discusses, it is apparent that there are brokers who have succumbed to the temptation and financial incentives offered by unethical settlement factoring firms to sell the names and contact information of annuitants who have structured settlements through their firm. This first came to light when I was contact by an attorney who had a structured fee with my office and who was solicited multiple times by the same firm to sell her fee structure. As there was no possible way that the information was public knowledge as the cases were settled privately and her structured legal fee wasn’t part of the court record, the information only could have come from brokers who split the case with my office.

This is a huge breech of privacy and I believe not only violates professional ethics, but possibly privacy laws regarding the safe guarding of a clients financial information. It is a huge black eye on our profession and I fully expect that there will be more of it, not less of it as structured settlement professionals who are struggling with the recent down turn in our business look for ways to stay afloat financially by being part of these questionable deals.

Be sure of one thing, this is being noticed by the life markets and structured settlement brokers and the people who are involved in this will be exposed and I would not be shocked if they lose life company selling agreements as a result.

In short this is serious business and those involved need to stop immediately or risk the loss of their professional viability going forward.

Selling structured settlements at effectively zero rates of return? Not for too much longer.

I take a break from my five day commentary on the structured settlement industry to instead cover the issue of interest rates and trying to sell structured settlements at what are effectively zero rates, a calculation arrived at by the average yield on structures being 3% to 4% and the effective rate of inflation running at the same 3% to 4% as well. I felt compelled to write this due to the bashing that Bill Gross, the brilliant bond manager of PIMCO is taking in the press for his Cassandra like warnings earlier this year for people to get out of US Treasury Bonds and long term fixed bonds in general due to the inevitable impact of the end of the administrations policy of pouring debt in to the bond market.

A lot of financial writers and bond managers keep talking as if the trillions in debt being issued, and brought, by the US Government and the resultant low interest rates, are here to stay for awhile, when the facts are that we are likely in for a swift and rude awakening regarding interest rates, the value of the dollar and the rate of inflation once this Ponzi Scheme, (Gross’ term, not mine) comes to it’s inevitable conclusion.

For those of us who are somewhat mathematically challenged, you arrive at the effective rate of return on an investment by taking the actual yield on a bond or structure, lets use 4%, and then measuring the actual or projected rate of inflation during the duration of the payments. By both established and colloquial measurements of inflation, we are seeing the cost of living in areas such as gas, insurance, food, commodities, utilities, etc, running well north of 4% right now. When matched against the yield on most structures of 3% to 4%, thanks to the continued plunge in interest rates toward zero, it is clear that most clients obtaining a structured settlement right now is essentially realizing a zero return on their allocation of funds.

Painful to admit, but intellectual and financial honesty require it.

That said, this situation will likely end soon, and change course quickly and dramatically, once the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury end the Quantitative Easing, i.e. QE II, and the Fed no longer buys 70% of the US Treasury Debt being issued like a flood into financial markets.

For a look at the scale and scope of this Ponzi Scheme of cycling debt click to the PIMCO site and commentary here.

The point being is that while I don’t pretend to be a market genius, I am pretty good at listening to the people in our midst who are the true geniuses, such as Bill Gross and Jim Druckenmiller, both of whom see this as the looming disaster it is about to become. Therefore, for those of us in the settlement profession who are advising people on allocating their one time settlement proceeds into structured settlement we need to be exceptionally careful about long term commitments at these rates and use designs that allow for reinvestment of funds in the near future when rates are higher.

We also need to be exceptionally careful to warn clients to NOT utilize outside managers for their funds who are buying bonds, bond funds, or any investment vehicle that would be impacted by a rise in rates. The carnage in bond funds that is about to occur, as well as asset value loss in a long bond’s market value, is going to be brutal.

The solution that we are recommending to clients who are receiving settlements and have to do SOMETHING with the money they are awarded, is to carefully structure payments monthly payments over the short and medium term to cover living costs, but then provide for lump sums to be reinvested in non-qualified accounts over 3 to 7 years at what are certain to be higher interest rates. While they will theoretically give up some of the tax advantage of a structure on the reinvestment, it is my experience that most of our clients are in a no tax or low tax rate scenario due to a very low real income and what they need more than tax free money is maximum cash flow and return from a highly secure investment. ( Ideally a non-qualified immediate annuity if suitable.)

The net result should be insuring the bills are paid today, no long term interest rate risk or exposure and large sums to reinvest when rates are higher. Not a perfect solution but one that works for the vast majority of our clients.

In summary, don’t be fooled by todays rates and the media reports of a resurgent economy. Interest rates have been cynically kept so low that people were forced to move funds into bonds and stocks, but the result over the next few years is that unless those stocks are in companies that benefit from inflation and the bonds are VERY short term in duration, those portfolios are going to be hammered. My advice is get liquid, cut debt and prepare to reinvest when the rates jump up dramatically in the next six to 12 months.

We won’t be selling zero yield structures for too much longer but in the mean time we need to prepare todays clients to reinvest when rates or risk further alienating our current and future clients through poor planning.